Actually, I do have something that bothering me like a stickerbugs (spurweeds or sticker weeds) in your drawers. If you're from the South, you know what that feels like. I've talked about Model Mayhem recently, so let me also give some time to deviantART. In whole, I like it. In part, I could live without a few things, two in particular. One, I'd like to see a block, screen, or filter made available to artists to keep their images from being faved, (and maybe even viewed) by people who lurk like scavenging bottom dwellers in other people's profiles, and have no gallery of their own. Sure, I know everyone is not an artists. Some are just art appreciators, but I have run into several questionables lately who fave my images that I have a difficult time saying thanks to when I check them out.
Second, I wish the moderators did a better job of screening what goes into the art nudes section. Now, I know they cruise through and dump some of your images into your scrap folder, but the other day, I was perusing through the latest additions and became quite annoyed at all the images of guys holding their peniises in their hands. One that really got me was a close-up image of a male buttt-holle. Is that really necessary? Can't we have SOME standards here? There were several more posted by the same individual sharing several intimate perspectives of the underside of his skrotum and I have a difficult time seeing this as anything resembling art. (Yes, I intentionally misspelled a few words to ward off evil spy-botts.)
Now let me also confess to my possible hypocrisy. I have had to defend some of my images that portray female genitalia with the pretext that its part of the body, just like anything else. I shoot the whole nude, and refuse to be stifled by taboos, opinions, and the such. I defend it as a beautiful part of the female body just like any other and if I shoot a nude who happens to have her nethers in view then just enjoy the composition or don't. Well, can the guy who posts his nads pose the same argument? Am I just biased towards women? Well, hell yeah...I know I am. I shoot what I love and it is the female form, not the male form, which appeals to me with great veracity. I just wish I could look at decent art nudes without the non-artistic elements added into this section. I don't mind mail nudes. I've done ma-ol nudes, myself as a mayle artt model. Dilemmas, dilemmas...
Good post!
ReplyDeleteErm....can you please define "non-artistic" for me? If you mean non-tasteful, then surely it's a matter of subjective preference?
It will be interesting to see if your personal comfort zone is the same in, say, five years time.
Cancel that last comment. I signed up to Deviant Art and found the images you're referring to. Now I'm a big fan of the male member, and my comfort zone is pretty wide nowadays, but yeuch!!!
ReplyDelete*pauses to hurl*
Nothing whatsoever to do with male members, and EVERYTHING to do with some of the crappiest, most awful photography I have ever seen.
Yes, please do complain to the moderators, not on grounds of content, but on grounds of absence any degree of taste or photographic technique whatsover....
*shudder*
Now I've got to try and forget what I've seen....
THATS what I mean!! You SAW what I was talking about? Good. You may have to scroll back a few pages since its been a few days now, but dA is now full of crappy stuff that's really getting to me. Now go watch "The Sound of Music" a few times to clean out the back of your retinas.
ReplyDelete